For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a buddy - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of basic triggers about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, however it's also a bit repeated, and really verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in looking at information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, because rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can buy any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in anyone's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, produced by AI, and videochatforum.ro developed "solely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, grandtribunal.org but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He intends to expand his variety, creating various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we really indicate human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe the use of generative AI for imaginative purposes must be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without authorization ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely effective but let's build it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize developers' material on the internet to help develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise highly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening one of its finest carrying out markets on the unclear guarantee of growth."

A government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to assist them certify their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a national data library consisting of public data from a large range of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the safety of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, kenpoguy.com and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector menwiki.men is under increasing examination over how it gathers training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a portion of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to read in parts because it's so long-winded.

But offered how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.